News & Updates

In cooperation with the American Ambulance Association, we and others have created a running compilation of local and national news stories relating to EMS delivery. Since January, 2021, over 1,900 news reports have been chronicled, with 48% highlighting the EMS staffing crisis, and 34% highlighting the funding crisis. Combined reports of staffing and/or funding account for 82% of the media reports! 99 reports cite EMS system closures/agencies departing communities, and 95% of the news articles reference staffing challenges, funding issues and response times.


Click below for an up to date list of these news stories, with links to the source documents.

Media Log Rolling Totals as of 5-15-24.xlsx

  • 10 Sep 2018 12:39 PM | AIMHI Admin (Administrator)

    Source Article | Courtesy of Matt Zavadsky

    Written by Julie Spitzer, Becker's Hospital Review 

    September 05, 2018

    As payers increasingly turn to alternate modes of care delivery as a way to keep patients with low-acuity conditions out of expensive emergency departments, recent evidence suggests that urgent care centers and retail clinics — not telehealth — appear to be patients' go-to options, a JAMA Internal Medicine investigation has found.

    A team of researchers led by Sabrina Poon, MD, a physician in the department of emergency medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, reviewed a set of deidentified claims data from Aetna between Jan. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2015. The cohort included about 20 million insured members per study year.

    Here are six study highlights:

    1. Visits to the ED for low-acuity conditions decreased 36 percent during the eight-year study period.
    2. Visits to non-ED facilities increased 140 percent.
    3. Retail clinics saw the greatest increase in visits for low-acuity conditions (214 percent), followed by urgent care centers (119 percent).
    4. Patients did not often utilize telemedicine for treatment. Specifically, telehealth saw an increase from 0 visits in 2008 to 6 visits per 1,000 members in 2015.
    5. Utilization (31 percent) and spending (14 percent) per person per year for low-acuity conditions increased during the study period.
    6. The increase in spending was driven by a 79 percent price hike per ED visit for the treatment of low-acuity conditions

    "From 2008 to 2015, total acute care utilization for the treatment of low-acuity conditions and associated spending per member increased, and utilization of non-ED acute care venues increased rapidly," the study authors concluded. "These findings suggest that patients are more likely to visit urgent care centers than EDs for the treatment of low-acuity conditions."

    To access the complete study, click here.



  • 4 Sep 2018 11:35 PM | Matt Zavadsky (Administrator)

    A very nice report, part of the IHI Patient Safety in the Home initiative.  

    A full report, with additional case studies can be found in the No Place Like Home: Advancing the Safety of Care in the Home report.

    --------------------------

    Can Paramedics Help Achieve the Triple Aim?

    By IHI Multimedia Team

    Friday, August 24, 2018

    Source Article 

    Background of the Problem

    Left unidentified and unaddressed, the medical, social, and patient safety concerns that arise in the home can increase the burden on emergency medical services and emergency departments. In particular, patients with complex medical conditions and/or challenging socioeconomic situations may be more reliant on emergency health care resources because they may face multiple barriers to accessing health care and other services, have unmet medical and social needs, or grapple with unsafe home conditions. Paramedics are proficient in interacting with patients in home settings and can respond quickly when patients need help. Paramedics thus represent an important resource for providing critical support and services to individuals who face safety and health care challenges at home.

    Description of the Program

    MedStar Mobile Healthcare, an EMS provider in the greater Fort Worth, Texas, area, developed a suite of programs designed to leverage the skills and expertise of paramedics to intervene with high-risk, high-need patients in home settings. These Mobile Integrated Healthcare (MIH) programs aim to ensure that patients receive safe, effective care in the most appropriate setting.

    Each of the MIH programs includes these components:

    • Processes to identify patients who are eligible for the program.
    • In-depth, home-based visits are conducted by specially trained Mobile Healthcare Paramedics (MHPs) to identify patients’ medical, social, behavioral, and safety-related needs.
    • Bimonthly care coordination meetings are held in which a MedStar program coordinator confers with hospital caseworkers, community service agencies, and other care providers to review the needs of enrolled patients.
    • Alternative services help patients avoid having to call for EMS, including the ability to request a home or telephone visit from an MHP instead of calling 911.
    • A continuously updated electronic medical record provides mobile access to information about the patient’s entire course of assessments and treatments while participating in the program.
    • Contractual arrangements exist between MedStar and hospitals, commercial insurers, and other health care service organizations to receive payments for the MIH services.

    MedStar identifies patients who qualify for its MIH programs using a variety of approaches and data sources:

    • MedStar identifies patients for the High Utilizer Program (those who have called 911 at least 15 times in the past 90 days) by analyzing 911 utilization data and receiving referrals from emergency departments, frontline MedStar staff, and other first-responder agencies, as well as agencies and payers partnered with MedStar.
    • Participating hospitals and physicians refer patients assessed as being at high risk for readmission within 30 days of discharge to the Readmission Prevention Program.
    • Agencies partnered with MedStar refer patients to the Home Health Partnership Program, the Hospice Revocation Avoidance Program, and the Observation Admission Avoidance Program.

    After a patient is deemed eligible for one of MedStar’s MIH programs, a specially trained MHP or a representative from a partner organization contacts the patient to explain the benefits of the program. If the patient agrees to participate, the patient signs a consent form authorizing the appropriate parties to share relevant patient information via the electronic medical record system.

    The MHP conducts an in-depth, in-home visit with the patient, family members, and caregivers. During the visit, the MHP performs a full medical assessment, evaluates the patient’s home environment and safety-related factors, and identifies opportunities to enroll the patient in other programs to help meet the patient’s clinical, social, or behavioral health needs (e.g., medication compliance, nutritional support, healthy lifestyle changes).

    Based on the assessment findings, the MHP works with the patient and family to develop or reinforce an individualized care plan, in coordination with the patient’s primary care network. This plan outlines the patient’s needs, associated goals, and steps needed to reach the goals. The patient and family members receive a copy of the plan, which is entered into the electronic medical record system and thereby is readily accessible to MHPs and other providers.

    The patient receives a telephone number to use to request an MHP home or telephone visit as an alternative to calling 911. Because MedStar is the 911 provider in the service area, if the patient calls 911, the MHP is dispatched to the patient’s location, along with the normal EMS system response. Once on scene, the MHP may apply established care protocols to address the patient’s needs, thereby preventing an unnecessary ambulance transport.

    The MHP conducts periodic follow-up visits with patients based on their needs. These visits provide an opportunity to evaluate any new medical or safety needs, monitor progress in meeting care plan goals, and provide the patient with additional supports or referrals.

    A MedStar MIH program coordinator meets bimonthly with hospital caseworkers, community service agencies, and other care providers to review the needs of patients who are enrolled in the program and to coordinate resources.

    Some of MedStar’s MIH programs have a formal “graduation” process for patients whose social and safety needs have been addressed and who can manage their own health care needs.

    Program Results

    MedStar’s MIH programs have garnered domestic and international interest as a promising strategy to address the health care and home safety needs of patients with complex medical conditions. MedStar has hosted site visits by representatives of more than 221 communities from 46 states and seven other countries who are interested in learning how the MIH programs work and replicating the MIH model.

    Across its portfolio of MIH programs, MedStar has “graduated” more than 8,500 patients. MedStar’s MIH programs have improved the quality of life for enrolled patients and reduced EMS transports to the hospital, ED visits, and hospital admissions, suggesting that the health of these patients is better because their health and safety needs were addressed at home.

    Evidence includes the following:

    • A retrospective evaluation [Published in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine] assessed pre- and post-intervention data for 64 patients who completed MedStar’s MIH High Utilizer Program. The evaluation showed that:
      • Patients who had reported problems with mobility, pain control, and ability to perform activities of daily living before participating in the program reported improvements in these areas (38, 42, and 58 percent, respectively) after participation.
      • After participation, 73 percent of patients rated their health as improved.
      • Patients had 61 percent fewer EMS transports, 66 percent fewer ED visits, and 56 percent fewer hospital admissions.
    • A MedStar report analyzed trends in pre- and post-enrollment utilization data among 581 patients enrolled in the MIH High Utilizer Program between October 2013 and March 2018. The analysis showed that:
      • Ambulance transports to the ED were reduced by 5,133 (58 percent), and ED visits and hospital admissions were reduced by 2,395 and 462, respectively.
      • The reductions in utilization decreased health care spending by $9.3 million during the evaluation period, for a savings of $16,046 per enrolled patient.
    • MedStar found a total expenditure savings of more than $14 million across all MIH programs between June 2012 and March 2018.13 This represents savings of about $3.2 million in ambulance transport, $4.5 million in ED visits, and $6.4 million in hospital admissions.
    • Between September 2013 and March 2018, 388 patients identified by a hospice agency as likely to disenroll from hospice were enrolled in MedStar’s Hospice Revocation Avoidance Program. Of those, only 18 percent had a disenrollment.
    • The patient experience across MedStar’s MIH programs was favorable, with overall average ratings ranging from 4.69 to 4.84 on a 5-point Likert scale assessing 12 items related to patient experience.
    • Between October 2013 and July 2017, 295 patients with a prior 30-day readmission were identified as being at high risk for another 30-day readmission and enrolled in the Readmission Prevention Program. Of those, 47.5 percent had a 30-day readmission, which evaluators considered lower than would have been expected.
  • 3 Sep 2018 5:28 PM | AIMHI Admin (Administrator)

    Source Article | Courtesy of Matt Zavadsky

    Nice article in JEMS that boils down the results of the PART study into understandable, and potentially actionable bites.

    Key statement(s) from the authors:

    Results

    The trial began enrollment on Dec. 1, 2015, and completed enrollment on Nov. 4, 2017. A total of 3,004 subjects were enrolled, with 1,505 assigned to initial King LT and 1,499 assigned to initial ETI. Patient demographics and arrest characteristics were similar in both groups.

    Elapsed time from first EMS arrival to airway start was shorter for King LT than ETI (mean 11.0 mins. vs. 13.6 mins.). Initial airway success rate was 89.9% in the King LT group and 51.3% in the ETI group. Overall, the King LT and ETI airway success rates (initial plus rescue airway attempts) were 94.2% and 91.5%, respectively. The ETI group was more likely to require more than three insertion attempts (18.9% vs. 4.5%).

    The main outcome of the study, 72-hour survival, was significantly higher for King LT than ETI (18.3% vs. 15.4%), a difference of 2.9%. Secondary outcomes were also better for King LT than ETI including: ROSC (27.9% vs. 24.3%), hospital survival (10.8% vs. 8.1%), and favorable neurological status at discharge (7.1% vs. 5.0%).

    The ETI group had higher rates of multiple airway insertion attempts, unsuccessful airway insertion, and unrecognized airway misplacement or dislodgement. Other in-hospital adverse events were similar between treatment groups.

    What It Means

    In this trial of 3,004 adults, we found that a strategy of initial King LT resulted in better 72-hour survival than initial ETI. Initial King LT also had better outcomes including ROSC, survival to hospital discharge, and favorable neurologic status at hospital discharge. Although these differences seem small, they’re important.

    If all EMS systems across the country were to shift to King LT as the primary advanced airway for OHCA patients and saw a similar 2.7% increase in hospital survival rate, more than 10,000 extra lives would be saved each year.

    ETI vs. SGA: The Verdict Is In

    A field guide to the results of the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial (PART)

    Thu, Aug 30, 2018

     By Shannon W. Stephens, EMT-P , Henry E. Wang, MD, MS , Pam Gray, EMT-P , Randal Gray, MEd, BS, EMT-P , Linda Mattrisch, BS, EMT-P , Ahamed H. Idris, MD , Mohamud Daya, MD, MS

    Read full article

  • 30 Aug 2018 5:29 PM | AIMHI Admin (Administrator)

    Congratulations to Alexia Jobson of REMSA on her unanimous election to Chair of the AIMHI Public Relations & Communications Committee. 


  • 30 Aug 2018 1:46 PM | AIMHI Admin (Administrator)
    Source Article Link | Courtesy of Matt Zavadsky & Scott Moore, Esq.

    Excellent overview of the EasCare program… 

    EasCare’s program was highlighted by Scott Cluett at the NAEMT EMS 3.0 Transformation Summit in April 2018.

    Tip of the hat to Scott for sharing this important news article!

    ------------------------------------

    A new role for paramedics: treating patients at home

    By Priyanka Dayal McCluskey, Globe Staff

    August 29, 2018

    QUINCY — The sun was setting as paramedic Matthew Michaud arrived at the second-floor apartment where Jamal Lee sat in pain.

    Lee, who uses a wheelchair, had a urinary tract infection, a sore groin, a headache, and spells of feeling hot and cold. But instead of taking Lee to the hospital, as most paramedics would, Michaud treated him at home.

    Over the course of more than two hours, as a Superman movie blared on the bedroom TV and Lee’s children played video games in the next room, Michaud checked his breathing, blood, and urine. He surveyed the part of Lee’s body that hurt and took pictures. He gave Lee some medicine.

    Michaud is among a small number of paramedics in Massachusetts working in pilot programs that allow them to treat patients with urgent medical needs at home, a practice that soon will be more common through money included in the recently approved state budget.

    Under the supervision of physicians, and with special training, these paramedics — part of an emerging field known as community paramedicine or mobile integrated health — can examine patients, administer medications, and provide care instructions.

    The goal is to avoid unnecessary and costly hospital visits while treating patients where they are most comfortable.

    These programs, proponents say, can be particularly helpful for patients who are frail, elderly, have chronic conditions, live in remote areas, or need care at night when doctor’s offices are closed.

    The concept has critics who worry whether paramedics have the right training to treat patients at home. But many in Massachusetts have high hopes and argue that expanding the role of paramedics is an important strategy for slashing health care costs and improving patient care.

    “As we think about how we can improve the value of care — making sure individuals get the health care that they need at a reasonable cost and at superb quality — the mobile integrated health program is something I’m very excited about because it has the potential for doing that,” said Dr. Monica Bharel, the Massachusetts commissioner of public health.

    With an additional $500,000 included in this year’s state budget, the Department of Public Health is hiring five people to run the state’s mobile integrated health program and expects to begin accepting applications this fall. In August, health officials adopted new state regulations that govern these programs.

    Paramedics responding to emergencies are generally required to take sick patients to a hospital, unless the patient refuses to go. But the new state rules waive this requirement for medics who are part of mobile integrated health programs.

    Similar efforts are underway in many other states, though Massachusetts officials say their initiative will be the most comprehensive in the nation. As it is implemented, they are likely to draw on the experience of two local ambulance companies, EasCare and Cataldo, which have been experimenting with programs over the past four years.

    EasCare Ambulance sends specially trained paramedics to see patients of Commonwealth Care Alliance, a Boston-based medical provider and insurer that manages care for low-income patients with chronic health issues who are covered both by Medicare and Medicaid.

    Commonwealth Care is paid a set amount of money to manage care for its patients. So when patients avoid expensive hospital visits, the company saves money.

    Under this pilot, patients who feel sick can call a number, and then a nurse decides, based on the severity of the symptoms, whether the patient should get a visit from a paramedic that evening. (The alternatives: wait until the next day for an appointment with a provider or go to the hospital right away.)

    Since late 2014, paramedics have completed more than 2,300 home visits for Commonwealth Care patients with lung disease, heart failure, chest pain, dehydration, UTIs, and other medical issues. About 82 percent of the time, paramedics were able to treat patients at home. Other patients were deemed sick enough to be sent to hospitals.

    All the avoided hospital visits have saved Commonwealth Care at least $6 million, according to company officials. They estimate that paramedics can treat patients at home at one-third the cost of hospital emergency rooms.

    “This replaces an urgent care visit, this replaces an ER visit,” said Dr. John Loughnane, the chief of innovation at Commonwealth Care.

    “The paramedics are my eyes and ears,” Loughnane added. “They can take a picture and upload it. They take direction of what I think is the appropriate [evaluation and treatment plan].”

    Paramedics have treated patient David Drayton at his apartment in Roxbury about half a dozen times this year. If they hadn’t come, Drayton said, he would have gone to the emergency room.

    “I don’t want to go the hospital, sit in the ER all day,” said Drayton, 41, who is quadriplegic and said he has frequent UTIs and stomach pain. “They can do it right here for you. I think they’re a big help.”

    Lee, the Quincy patient, feels the same way. He has had health problems since a gunshot wound three decades ago caused a spinal cord injury that cost him most of the use of his limbs.

    The 47-year-old tries to stay active — he drives and looks after his children. But on a recent day this summer, he felt too sick to bring himself to his nurse practitioner’s office, and he didn’t want to go to the hospital.

    So Michaud, an EasCare paramedic, was dispatched to check on him. When Michaud arrived, he asked Lee a series of questions.

    “Pain?” he asked. “On a scale of 1 to 10, how bad [is it]?”

    “About 7 to 9,” Lee replied, propped up in bed.

    Michaud drew some blood and analyzed it instantly with a handheld device. He took a urine sample and made room on the kitchen counter to test it. Then he stepped out to his ambulance — a Ford Escape SUV — to confer with the doctor and nurse practitioner on call about what to do next.

    Michaud returned inside to give Lee an IV antibiotic for his infection. There are no IV poles in Lee’s bedroom, but Michaud found a nail on the wall that served the same purpose.

    Lee was still in pain. But “mentally,” he said, “I feel like I’m doing something about what’s going on. If you have to just deal with it, that’s depressing.”

    The expanded role for paramedics such as Michaud is in some ways similar to what visiting nurses have been doing for many years. But nurses typically visit patients on regular schedules — not for emergencies. And while nurses have higher levels of training, they don’t carry the stock of medicines that paramedics have in their ambulances.

    “Paramedics are very good at walking into a room and determining whether somebody is sick or not sick, just by looking at them and their environment,” said Scott Cluett, director of mobile integrated health for EasCare Ambulance. “Previously, working on an ambulance, they were just hooking and hauling — grabbing somebody in the street and bringing them to the ER. Now we’re really involved with that patient’s care, and it’s very rewarding.”

    Ambulance companies stand to benefit from the new state rules that allow them to grow their business with these new programs. The programs also might appeal to health care providers and insurers that have a financial stake in managing the health of their patients and are trying to reduce costs.

    More than 40 percent of emergency room visits are thought to be avoidable; they involve patients with problems that safely could be treated in less costly settings, according to state estimates.

    “Reducing readmissions and reducing visits to the emergency room is really what the program is about,” said Dennis Cataldo, vice president of Cataldo Ambulance Service.

    Cataldo Ambulance launched a pilot program with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center about four years ago. Most of the patients treated by paramedics in that program avoided hospital visits, Cataldo officials said.

    But not everyone likes the idea.

    Donna Glynn, president of the Massachusetts chapter of the American Nurses Association, a professional association, said nurses — not paramedics — should be treating patients at home.

    “Paramedics aren’t trained in chronic care management,” she said. “A paramedic is just jumping in, putting a Band-Aid on something, and leaving.”

    At the Home Care Alliance of Massachusetts, which represents home care agencies, executive director Patricia Kelleher said she supports programs that help patients avoid emergency room visits, but she worries about duplication of home care services already done by nurses.

    Doctors who work in emergency departments, meanwhile, are concerned that paramedicine programs might keep at home some patients who need or want to go to the hospital, said Dr. Scott Weiner, president of the Massachusetts College of Emergency Physicians.

    “It all depends on the details,” he said.


  • 30 Aug 2018 10:23 AM | Matt Zavadsky (Administrator)

    Nice to see this economic model growing!

    Highmark now joins payers like Anthem, Arizona Medicaid, BCBS in Texas and Georgia, paying EMS for things other than transporting patients to the hospital.

    Shout out to Robert McCaughan, our friend and former Pittsburg EMS Chief, now the vice president of pre-hospital care services for Allegheny Health Network! Surely Bob’s fingerprints are on this project!!

    Tip of the hat to Chris Kelly for making us aware of this article!


    ----------------------------------------------------- 

    Highmark pilot program to pay ambulance companies when patients not taken to hospital

    BRIAN C. RITTMEYER | Wednesday, Aug. 29, 2018


    Source Article


    Highmark will reimburse ambulance companies for certain calls where patients aren’t taken to hospitals as part of a new “treat-and-release” program.

    Highmark and Allegheny Health Network announced the pilot program Wednesday.

    Currently, Highmark’s benefits and medical policy, similar to most insurers’ policies, only allows payment for emergency ambulance services when the patient is taken to an emergency room.

    “We want to ensure that ambulance services are paid appropriately and members receive appropriate care,” said Robert Wanovich, vice president of ancillary provider strategy and management for Highmark.

    Sixteen ambulance services across 12 counties are participating, according to spokeswoman Stephanie Waite. They include Butler Ambulance, Cranberry Township EMS, Kittanning EMS, Medical Rescue Team South, Mon Valley EMS, Pittsburgh EMS, Plum EMS, Ross West View EMS, Rostraver EMS and Valley Ambulance.

    Waite said Highmark is not disclosing how much it will pay ambulance companies per call under the program.

    Under the pilot program, Highmark will contract with and reimburse participating emergency medical services for treating patients age 18 and older who have low blood sugar, asthma attacks and seizure disorders, without the requirement of being taken to an emergency department.

    “The goal of the pilot is to reduce unnecessary emergency department visits and improve the overall patient experience, decrease health care costs and ensure that ambulance services are paid fairly and members receive appropriate care,” a Highmark news release said.

    Patients will be treated and assessed on-scene based on standard state-approved protocols and under the oversight of an emergency medicine physician. Allegheny Health Network staff will follow up by phone within 48 hours to check the patient’s condition.

    “As a hospital system, patient care is our highest priority,” said Robert McCaughan, vice president of pre-hospital care services for Allegheny Health Network. “If patients who call for an ambulance in non-emergent situations can be assessed and treated on-site, that helps free up our emergency department and emergency department staff – as well as the ambulance service - for true emergencies and more efficient patient care.”

    Brian Maloney, director of operations for Plum EMS, called the program a good one.

    “Insurance doesn’t cover anything unless we transport to the hospital,” he said. “A lot of times we show up, we treat and many times because it’s a recurrent issue for them they don’t go to the hospital. What we provide them prevents them from going to the emergency department.”

    Treat-and-release “can prevent a lot of money from being spent where it doesn’t have to,” he said. “It’s a step in the right direction. It’s a significant step as well.”

    What Maloney said he likes the most about it is the follow-up call.

    “I really like the approach that’s being taken here,” he said.

    Wanovich said that patient participation in the pilot program is voluntary.

    “If a patient wants to be transported to a hospital, they will be,” he said.


  • 29 Aug 2018 8:04 PM | Matt Zavadsky (Administrator)

    Nearly 10% of hospitals are at risk of closure, according to a new analysis. 

    by Paige Minemyer | Aug 27, 2018 2:46pm

    Source Article

    Morgan Stanley, an investment bank and financial services company, analyzed data on more than 6,000 hospitals and found that 450, or 8%, are at risk for closure. Plus, an additional 10% are performing weakly, meaning close to 20% of hospitals are not operating in a “healthy” way. 

    Morgan Stanley attributed those figures to a number of potential risk factors, including: 

    • A higher-occupancy facility is located nearby.
    • Low capital expenditures.
    • For-profit status instead of nonprofit status.
    • A lower operating efficiency index, which measures how well a hospital can turn federal reimbursements into profit. 

    The report also cited new competitors and disruptors—such as retail healthcare—and the rise of high-deductible health plans amid skyrocketing prices as factors impacting hospital profits. 

    “While potential disruption from the new Amazon venture has been grabbing headlines, we think closures will enter the narrative on hospitals during the next 12 to 18 months,” the group said in the report. 

    Gurpreet Singh, partner and U.S. health services leader at PwC, told FierceHealthcare that these disruptors are especially a threat to smaller, rural hospitals that can’t adjust as quickly to the changing landscape of the industry. 

    Regional facilities are often so focused on day-to-day operational concerns that they’re not as agile in planning for new challenges—and often fail to react until it’s too late, Singh said. These facilities, too, often operate in a heavily fee-for-service way, creating additional “inefficiency in the value change.” 

    This uncertainty makes these smaller hospitals more likely to align with bigger systems, he said. “A standalone entity has difficulty having the right level of scale and the right level of offerings to patients and consumers,” he said. 

    Morgan Stanley flagged this trend, too, and noted that consolidation in healthcare may have paid off initially for providers but is “not a cure-all" for poor financial performance. 

    Plus, growing interested in vertical mergers—such as the proposed deal between CVS Health and Aetna—has forced providers to rethink their role in the healthcare system, Singh said. Academic medical centers, for example, can use their research arms for product development and larger health systems are able to offer a health plan on top of their traditional services. 

    However, the most at-risk hospitals lack the capabilities to try these new approaches, he said. 

    “If you’re not in the game of creating new growth opportunities, then you’re at risk of being upside down, so to speak, and at risk, obviously, of closure,” Singh said. 


  • 29 Aug 2018 12:52 PM | AIMHI Admin (Administrator)

    Source Article | Download Research Report

    DALLAS – Aug. 28, 2018 – Heart attack patients given a different type of breathing tube by paramedics had better survival rates than those treated by traditional intubation breathing tube methods – findings that could potentially save more than 10,000 lives annually, researchers report.

    Only about 10 percent of people who suffer cardiac arrest outside hospital settings survive, and paramedics currently use both breathing tube techniques. By comparing the two in real-world situations, investigators were able to identify a 3 percent better survival rate for patients who received the laryngeal tube (LT) device on scene than those who received the standard intubation tube. The landmark study was the latest in a decades long series of investigations that have improved paramedic care after cardiac arrest.

    “When we first started working with EMS agencies in Dallas-Fort Worth in 2006, the survival rate from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was about 4 percent. Because of the efforts we have made in measuring and improving CPR performance, the rate is now about 10 percent – more than double,” said Dr. Ahamed Idris, Professor of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine at UT Southwestern who led the North Texas arm of the study. “A further improvement of 3 percent because of better airway management translates into a survival rate of 13 percent, which is a relative 30 percent improvement in the DFW area.”

    The Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial (PART) – funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, part of the National Institutes of Health – was the largest randomized clinical study of its kind. The new findings appear in JAMA.

    “This is the first randomized trial to show that a paramedic airway intervention can improve cardiac arrest survival. Based on these results, use of the newer LT devices could result in over 10,000 extra lives saved each year,” said first author Dr. Henry E. Wang, Vice Chair for Research in the Department of Emergency Medicine at UT Health Science Center at Houston.

    While identical to techniques used by doctors in the hospital, intubation in the prehospital setting is very difficult and fraught with errors, he said. Researchers believe that the benefits of the newer LT airway are due to its easier technique, leading to better blood flow and oxygen delivery. The LT devices allow first responders to continue uninterrupted CPR on cardiac arrest patients, with a potential to get thousands of additional cases into the nearest hospitals for further care.

    Firefighters, emergency medical technicians, and paramedics from 27 EMS agencies in several cities administered either traditional endotracheal intubation breathing tubes or an LT airway to about 3,000 adult patients with sudden cardiac arrest. The study, conducted by the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium, tracked emergency care delivery in Dallas-Fort Worth; Birmingham, Alabama; Milwaukee; Pittsburgh; and Portland, Oregon, from December 2015 to November 2016.

    “Paramedics use both endotracheal intubation and laryngeal airway devices as standards of care for airway management and ventilation during out-of-hospital CPR. The study was done to determine if one of these standard of care techniques produced better outcomes than the other,” said Dr. Idris, Division Chief for Research in Emergency Medicine and Director of the Dallas-Fort Worth Center for Resuscitation Research sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, part of the North American Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium.

    A total of 18.3 percent in the LT group survived three days in the hospital compared with 15.4 percent of cardiac patients who were initially intubated. A total of 10.8 percent in the LT group survived to reach 10-day hospital survival compared with 8.1 percent in the intubation group.

    PART provides knowledge that will improve survival from cardiac arrest,” Dr. Idris added. “The results of this study will be used by EMS medical directors to inform their choice of airway technique that paramedics will use during CPR for cardiac arrest cases. Continuing careful measurement of performance and techniques is essential to improve outcomes from life-threatening illnesses.”

    Sudden cardiac arrest is most often caused by a heart attack, and delivery of oxygen to the lungs is a critical part of reviving a patient. More than 400,000 individuals are treated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest each year, according to the American Heart Association.

    About UT Southwestern Medical Center

    UT Southwestern, one of the premier academic medical centers in the nation, integrates pioneering biomedical research with exceptional clinical care and education. The institution’s faculty has received six Nobel Prizes, and includes 22 members of the National Academy of Sciences, 16 members of the National Academy of Medicine, and 15 Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigators. The faculty of more than 2,700 is responsible for groundbreaking medical advances and is committed to translating science-driven research quickly to new clinical treatments. UT Southwestern physicians provide care in about 80 specialties to more than 105,000 hospitalized patients, nearly 370,000 emergency room cases, and oversee approximately 2.4 million outpatient visits a year.


  • 24 Aug 2018 11:55 AM | AIMHI Admin (Administrator)
    AIMHI's members are working hard to advance high performance EMS and mobile integrated healthcare. Don't miss any of the best practices, forward-thinking projects, or fun!


    Social Media & Website

    Contact Information Update

    AIMHI is moving! Please update your files to reflect the following:

    Administrator
    Amanda Riordan
    hello@aimhi.mobi
    703-615-4492 (text or voice)

    Address
    Until September 30
    AIMHI c/o AAA
    8400 Westpark Dr #200
    McLean, VA 221

    Beginning October 1
    AIMHI c/o AAA
    1420 New York Ave NW
    5th Floor
    Washington DC, 20005

    Thank you for your support!


  • 23 Aug 2018 8:48 AM | Matt Zavadsky (Administrator)

    This renewed emphasis could have an impact in states where they are using waivers to fund Medicaid payments for innovative EMS delivery models, such as MIH-CP, or alternate destination/treat and refer programs.

    A careful fiscal analysis will be needed to demonstrate downstream savings for Medicaid to assure at least budget neutrality.

    ------------------------------- 

    CMS vows to curb costs of state Medicaid demonstrations

    By Susannah Luthi  | August 22, 2018

    http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20180822/NEWS/180829959 

    The CMS is tightening its financial oversight of state Medicaid waiver demonstrations, the agency announced Wednesday in formal guidance emphasizing that the changes must be budget-neutral.

    Federal law requires Medicaid demonstrations to be budget-neutral, and the CMS can't disburse additional funds for the proposals. The CMS said in its guidance that it will run tighter analysis on demonstration costs to make sure states are meeting budget-neutrality

    The agency will not approve waivers that predict the federal government will incur additional costs. In a statement, CMS Administrator Seema Verma reiterated that federal Medicaid spending jumped by $100 billion from 2013 to 2016. That span includes the first years of Medicaid expansion, and the CMS mainly shoulders those costs.

    "Today's guidance is a comprehensive explanation of how CMS and our state partners can ensure that new demonstration projects can simultaneously promote Medicaid's objectives and keep federal spending under control," Verma said.

    Along with the guidance, the CMS unveiled a new monitoring tool it will require states to use for all their demonstrations. States will need to upload all the financial data of a given Medicaid demonstration into the tool, which will consolidate the numbers in one report to the agency. 

    On Tuesday, Verma and U.S. Comptroller General Gene Dodaro voiced concerns to a Senate panel that states sometimes use demonstrations to draw down additional funds. Dodaro also said states fall short when it comes to evaluating the demonstrations that are supposed to serve as test runs to inform new policy and noted that the CMS "continues to need written guidance on the methodologies for demonstrating budget neutrality."

    Dodaro told Senate lawmakers that a 2016 CMS policy that curbed states' ability to keep left-over funds from their demonstration or carry them forward to new demonstrations had saved the federal government nearly $63 billion in two years. But the policy did not affect all the "questionable methods" the Government Accountability Office had identified in how the CMS determines demonstration spending limits, he said.


© 2024 Academy of International Mobile Healthcare Integration | www.aimhi.mobi | hello@aimhi.mobi

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software