News & Updates

In cooperation with the American Ambulance Association, we and others have created a running compilation of local and national news stories relating to EMS delivery. To date, over 1,500 news stories have been chronicled, with 56% highlighting the EMS staffing crisis, and 38% highlighting the funding crisis.

Click below for an up to date list of these news stories, with links to the source documents.

EMS Media Log Through 1-8-24 Read Only.xlsx

  • 26 Oct 2023 4:49 PM | Matt Zavadsky (Administrator)

    Special thanks to JP Peterson at MEDIC in Charlotte, NC for agreeing to share their experiences with this reporter…

    --------------------------

    Knox County's struggling ambulance service will change. What will that look like?

    Tyler Whetstone

    October 25, 2023

    https://www.knoxnews.com/story/news/local/2023/10/25/knox-county-struggling-ambulance-service-will-change-under-new-contract/71204237007/

    Knox County doesn’t pay a dime for the private ambulances that serve sick and injured people, but lengthening response times have leaders rethinking whether they need to spend public money to fix the problem fast.

    The only solution could require an annual investment of a few million in tax dollars, and that decision is looming. Knox County commissioners will decide in November on a new emergency services contract.

    The stakes are high, especially for the injured or sick waiting for help to arrive.

    County leaders might have to get creative to ensure reliable ambulance service, especially in an American health care system where too many patients rely on emergency rooms for care that should be provided in clinics, and hospitals operate with razor-thin staffing and under tremendous pressure to generate income.

    A consultant hired to review the local situation, Fitch & Associates, said the soon-to-expire contract with American Medical Response is "financially nonviable." A Fitch representative told commissioners Oct. 16 the county likely will have to subsidize any contract by paying $1.9 million to $3 million each year.

    With ambulance response times in Knox County often topping 17 minutes for the most serious calls such as trauma, heart attack and stroke, patients and health care professionals are sounding the alarm.

    So, too, are Knoxville firefighters and cops who are often first to arrive when a person is in distress but limited by law and training in what care and transport they can provide. This month, Knoxville police spokesperson Scott Erland described the situation to Knox News in no uncertain terms.

    “The harsh truth is that, in the current state of ambulance services in Knox County, there’s no guarantee an ambulance will show up quickly or at all," Erland said, "leaving residents who need urgent care in a situation where they potentially have to find their own way to the hospital.”

    In order to understand the county's options, Knox News analyzed ambulance service in two counties grappling with similar challenges: Hamilton County, home to Chattanooga, and Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, home to Charlotte. Both operate their own EMS systems, but there are insights to bring to Knox County's problems.

    Here’s a look at where we are and where the county can go from here.

    Knox County increased allowable response times

    Knox County’s ambulance service is provided by American Medical Response, or AMR. The contract originally set response time goals of 10 minutes or fewer on any call 90% of the time.

    But as market conditions changed, the contract was adjusted to give AMR 17 minutes to arrive for any call.

    Even with the extension, ambulances are unlikely to come that quickly, especially once you leave the Knoxville city limits.

    In 2022, outlying areas, including Corryton, Farragut, Mascot, Powell and Strawberry Plains, had a response time more than 17 minutes on priority one calls (which are the most life-threatening situations) 90% of the time. Knoxville was the only place with call times of less than 17 minutes 90% of the time ‒ and it barely hit that mark.

    Outside of Knoxville, ambulances arrived in other places on average between 18.5 to 26 minutes after a call for help came in, according to data provided in the Fitch review.

    Proposal for zoned response would reduce response times - at a cost

    Ambulances are required to serve the entire county, but Fitch proposed splitting the county up in zones centered on the city, on North and East Knox County and on West Knox County and Farragut.

    Dividing Knox County into three zones, one covering the city of Knoxville and two covering the rest of the county outside city limits, could reduce response times. Those who live outside the city, however, still could wait up to 20 minutes for even the most serious medical emergencies.

    In that zone structure, the county could implement a system designed to provide emergency medical services response times under 10 minutes for 90% of calls from Knoxville residents, and under 20 minutes for 90% of county residents outside city limits.

    This proposal is expected to cost upwards of $3 million and would be more expensive if responses were reduced further. For example, a 10-minute urban, 15-minute rural response time would require more EMS resources and would be more expensive.

    Learning from Hamilton County

    Hamilton County is a slightly smaller mirror of Knox County, both in population and its urban/rural divide. The county has run its own EMS system since 1988 and offers a few ideas to emulate.

    The county’s average response time is 10 minutes, EMS director John Miller told Knox News. Like Knox County, Hamilton County deals with extended "wall times," the insider term for how long ambulance crews have to wait at a hospital before the patient they brought is admitted.

    Recently, Hamilton County has pushed back on emergency room wait times with an offload policy that allows them to simply leave patients inside an emergency waiting room. The policy is included in their agreement with local hospitals.

    “It’s not the hospitals’ fault, but we can’t have five trucks waiting two hours,” deputy director Wade Batson said. “(Hospitals) don’t like it, but at the end of the day, something has got to give.”

    AMR sometimes does this now, but staffers are more likely to group a few patients together at an ER with a single employee watching them.

    Hamilton County's costs track with Knox County's expected bill

    The Hamilton County-run ambulance system costs about what Knox County will likely end up paying. Hamilton County budgeted $17.9 million for EMS for the 2023 fiscal year but softened the financial hit by using $15.7 million in expected revenues from ambulance service, paid mostly by patients' insurers. The direct cost to taxpayers is $2.2 million.

    But those are the annual costs to operate a system that already exists. Starting one up means buying ambulances and hiring more skilled staffers.

    New ambulances, for instance, take at least 18 months to arrive after they're ordered and cost more than $300,000 apiece, according to the Fitch review.

    Charlotte metro wait times have gotten longer … and leaders brag about it

    Earlier this year, leaders in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, turned their EMS system on its head. The county’s EMS system serves more than 1 million people, more than double Knox County's population.

    The door to change was already opening as costs started to outpace revenues. Mecklenburg EMS Agency executive director John “JP” Peterson told Knox News the COVID-19 pandemic blew open the doors of possibilities for rethinking ambulance service.

    In April, the county switched to a system that relies heavily on triage dispatch to determine the severity of the patient's medical condition. If the condition is potentially life-threatening, an ambulance is expected to arrive in less than 11 minutes.

    In less-severe cases, responders are given a cushion. The scaled system goes from 11 minutes to 15 to 30 and finally, for those who need assistance but not right away – think about sprained ankles – EMS has up to one hour to arrive.

    Peterson said the county previously dispatched ambulances for potentially life-threatening emergencies about 75% of the time, but those cases turned out to truly be life-threatening just 5% of the time. About 35% of patients didn’t need to go to the hospital at all.

    “The public sometimes doesn’t realize that everyone who calls 911 isn’t experiencing a life-threatening (event). … We have to pivot and do a combination of readjusting our system response (and) educating the public,” Peterson said.

    This type of dispatch depends on a near-perfect triage system, where trained professionals can take calls and quickly work through a sometimes lengthy set of questions to determine whether a person needs immediate assistance.

    In the months since Mecklenburg County implemented the new system, dispatchers have classified 30,000 calls as low priority. That means an ambulance crew has up to an hour to respond.

    Of those calls, less than 1% needed a quicker transport, Peterson said, and there have been no deaths or averse outcomes from the new policy.

    Knox County will likely copy the triage system in some way. In its proposal for Knox County, Fitch & Associates suggested some sort of tiered response system based on the severity of call.

    Peterson says the new policy is a bright spot amid constantly increasing EMS costs, though there’s admittedly a very long way to go.

    “If all of this is successful, then in the future, maybe 5 to 10 years from now, hopefully we will need less resources to do the work," he said.

    "But that’s pipe dream, down-the-road thinking.”

    What can you stand? What can you pay?

    Matt Zavadsky is an EMS expert for the Center for Public Safety Management and the chief transformation officer at MedStar Mobile Healthcare, which operates the EMS service in Fort Worth, Texas.

    In Fort Worth, emergency crews responded to 450,000 911 calls over a 3-year period and just over 2% of calls required lifesaving care. The rest of callers, he said, don't need an ambulance within the nine minutes he defined as an immediate response.

    The choice for how the system should be shaped is entirely up to the community and what it’s willing to accept, Zavadsky told Knox News.

    Will we demand 9-minute response times? Are 20-minute response times OK?

    The fewer the minutes it takes an ambulance to arrive, the more money it costs taxpayers.

    You end up settling on “what your heart can withstand, and your wallet can bear,” he said.

    So many factors have led to a broken system

    Everyone from experts in the field to county officials running the process agrees the system is messed up regardless of what model is used.

    The challenges include many out of the hands of public officials, such as an increasing reliance by patients on emergency rooms for primary care best provided in clinics.

    Zavadsky, the Fort Worth official, has seen firsthand that EMS costs have skyrocketed “50-70%” since 2020, much of it in additional personnel costs. Employees have received a 58% increase in wages in the past 18 months, he said.

    “The primary driver in that is personnel. When COVID happened, EMTs making $17-20 an hour figured, 'Maybe this isn’t worth risking my life for,'” he said. “Then you had the nursing shortage and hospitals' desire to hire EMTs and paramedics to work there for half of what they pay (nurses).”


  • 13 Oct 2023 1:10 PM | Matt Zavadsky (Administrator)

    Kudos to the folks in California for coming together on this effective legislation designed to protect patients and providers from surprise underpayments by insurers…

    Very similar to the recently enacted Texas legislation that requires insurers to pay billed charges, as long as the local government has published their rates.

    Another example of state legislation that the GAPBAC should consider to national replication… 

    Salient language below…

    ------------------

    https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB716

    SEC. 2. Section 1371.56 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:

    1371.56. (a) (1) Unless otherwise required by this chapter, a health care service plan contract issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2024, shall require an enrollee who receives covered services from a noncontracting ground ambulance provider to pay no more than the same cost-sharing amount that the enrollee would pay for the same covered services received from a contracting ground ambulance provider. This amount shall be referred to as the “in-network cost-sharing amount.”

    (d) (1) Unless otherwise agreed to by the noncontracting ground ambulance provider and the health care service plan, the plan shall directly reimburse a noncontracting ground ambulance provider for ground ambulance services the difference between the in-network cost-sharing amount and an amount described, as follows:

    (A) If there is a rate established or approved by a local government, at the rate established or approved by the governing body of the local government having jurisdiction for that area or subarea, including an exclusive operating area pursuant to Section 1797.85.

    (B) If the local government having jurisdiction where the service was provided does not have an established or approved rate for that service, the amount established by Section 1300.71 (a)(3)(B) of Title 28 of the California Code of Regulations.


  • 12 Oct 2023 1:07 PM | Matt Zavadsky (Administrator)

    Hopefully, the GAPBAC is watching developments like this!? 

    Seems IDR for surprise underpayments may not be an ideal solution…

    -----------------------------

    Surprise billing arbitration is still a mess

    Maya Goldman

    October 12, 2023

    https://www.axios.com/2023/10/12/surprise-billing-arbitration-is-still-a-mess


    Nearly two years after a surprise medical bill ban took effect, the process for settling billing disputes between insurers and providers is still mired in litigation and many cases remain unresolved.

     

    Why it matters: Uncertainty around how providers get paid for disputed out-of-network services isn't likely to ease as multiple challenges to the Biden administration arbitration rules continue to work through the courts.

     

    Driving the news: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services last week reopened its portal for providers to submit new claims for unpaid out-of-network services to arbitration for the first time since early August.

     

    Federal officials also said last week that they don't have plans to release new guidance on how insurers should calculate a key benchmark used to determine payment for a disputed bill. Officials will exercise enforcement discretion over calculations for at least six months.

     

    A federal district court tossed out portions of the regulations for calculating that benchmark in August, but the Biden administration said it plans to appeal.

     

    Catch up quick: The No Surprises Act has protected consumers against unexpected medical bills since the beginning of 2022. But figuring out how insurers should actually pay out-of-network claims has proven to be a major headache.

     

    The Texas Medical Association has filed four lawsuits against the administration over different aspects of the law and its corresponding regulations.

     

    By the numbers: Between April 15, 2022, and March 31, 2023, while the claims resolution process was underway, federal arbitrators sided with providers in about 71% of disputed claims that were resolved, according to a government update published earlier this year.

     

    Claims went to arbitration nearly 14 times more than officials expected in the first year of the process. However, a survey produced by insurers this summer found that providers accepted the insurers' initial payment offer in 88% of disputes.

     

    Still, radiologists, anesthesiologists and emergency department physicians — some of the specialties most frequently involved — are "very concerned about this delay in full enforcement" of the arbitration rules, five trade organizations said in a joint statement this week.

     

    Enforcement of insurers' compliance with surprise bill payment to providers is already lacking, and the latest federal guidance gives payers more leeway, the provider groups said.

     

    Providers face "a bumpy and expensive road ahead," Jeffrey Davis, health policy director at McDermott+Consulting, wrote.

     

    The other side: Insurers are frustrated, too. Continued lawsuits have eroded the structure around the No Surprises Act, said Adam Beck, a senior vice president at health insurance trade group AHIP.

     

    "We, from the outset, said that an arbitration-based system is going to be costly, it's going to be cumbersome and it could end up increasing health care costs," he said. "And unfortunately, that's what we're seeing."

     

    That said, many of insurers' challenges with the arbitration process could be solved with technical updates, Beck added.

    "It's not grand policymaking. Sometimes it's just adding a new drop-down menu," he said.

     

    What we're watching: There's a good chance that some litigation over the No Surprises Act makes it all the way to the Supreme Court, Beck said.

     

    In the meantime, the Biden administration's appeals over Texas court decisions on their arbitration rules will continue. Several individual court challenges over specific arbitration cases have popped up as well, noted Matthew Fiedler, senior fellow at the Brookings Schaeffer Initiative on Health Policy.

     

    And while patients remain insulated from most surprise medical bills under federal law, these squabbles could have trickle-down effects.

     

    The prices ultimately paid to providers after arbitration could drive up premiums, Fiedler said. The ever-changing rules being challenged in court could also lead to some incorrect cost-sharing for patients, according to Davis.


  • 9 Oct 2023 7:43 AM | Matt Zavadsky (Administrator)

    An excellent insight into one of the primary drivers of ED delays and boarders in the ED.

    At the recent American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Summit on ED Boarding, the inability to discharge inpatients was a major driver highlighted. This is exacerbated by the paltry economic model for post-discharge providers, including ambulance service.

    As an example of how economics and payment reform drive this process, I recently received a phone call from the Executive Director of one of the largest Medicaid MCOs in the DFW metroplex. He said he had 5 inpatients waiting for ambulance trips in Dallas (not MedStar’s service area), and he could not get any agency to transfer the patients out. He went on to explain that the cost of the inpatient facility care was significantly higher than if the patients were to be transferred to the post-discharge facilities. We discussed the low Medicaid reimbursement, and EMS shortages due to the staffing and economic crisis as the likely reason he could not find a provider and suggested that it may be in his economic interest to offer a higher reimbursement for the services to facilitate the ambulance transfers – which he said he could and would do.

    Not also the opinion that payment reform could help patients get the right care, in the right setting, avoiding preventable hospital visits. The EMS profession has been promoting that change for years, since currently, we are ONLY reimbursed for services by Medicare and most commercial insurers who follow the Medicare rules, if we transport a 911 patient to the ED. A perfect example of how payment policy drives clinical practice.

    --------------------  

    Opinion: Discharge delays are another sign of a broken healthcare system

    Chris Van Gorder

    October 04, 2023

    https://www.modernhealthcare.com/opinion/scripps-health-ceo-chris-van-gorder-discharge-delays-broken-healthcare-system

    August marked a milestone for Scripps Health and one of our patients. After two years and three months at Scripps Mercy Hospital San Diego, the patient was finally able to leave. The patient didn’t need to be in an acute-care hospital for that long; there was just nowhere else for him to go. With a severe behavioral health diagnosis and a county mental health conservatorship, he required transfer to a specific, locked level of care. But there was no space available. So he stayed.

    His situation is not unique. Another patient has been at one of our hospitals for more than a year and a half waiting for a county bed. During that time, he has exhibited disruptive behavior, including multiple episodes of hitting and throwing objects at staff members.

    We have a number of patients who have been in our hospitals for more than 500 days. Our longest-term patient has been here for 2 1/2 years. He is on a five-year wait list for a state psychiatric hospital, but open beds for transfers are extremely rare, with priority given to state criminal patients over those being boarded at hospitals.

    If we cannot move patients out of beds when they are ready to leave, we cannot take in more patients. It’s as simple as that. So we face bottlenecks—acute-care beds occupied with patients we cannot discharge even though they are ready to leave, which backs up patients in the emergency department. That, in turn, backs up ambulances waiting to offload patients.

    This problem exists at hospitals across the country. A survey conducted over a three-month period last year by the Healthcare Association of New York State found that the 52 responding hospitals accrued 60,000 avoidable bed days at an estimated cost of $169 million. A report by the University of California Davis Medical Center said it racked up more than 7,800 ABDs in 2019 at a total cost of $20.4 million. According to an Advisory Board 2019 report, 71% of hospitals have at least 500 avoidable bed days per 1,000 cases.

    At Scripps Health, we record more than 33,000 avoidable beds days annually. That’s up from about 11,000 three years ago. Our daily average jumped from 30 in 2019 to 91 in 2023. Over that period, the annual costs we absorb have skyrocketed, from $16.7 million to $59 million.

    This is a state and national policy failure—one of many involving regulations and unfunded mandates focused on hospitals. The real problems that need to be addressed are chronic and intentional underfunding and a focus on fixing parts of the system rather than the broader issues threatening hospitals. Piecemeal legislation and policymaking won’t get the job done.

    At the urging of the American Hospital Association and hospitals across the country, Congress considered proposals in December 2022 to compensate hospitals for some of their avoidable bed day costs through a temporary Medicare payment adjustment, but to date, none of those proposals have advanced.

    Several reasons account for why these patients have nowhere to go. In San Diego, we have just over 800 inpatient behavioral health beds, but we need more than 1,600. Many step-down healthcare providers might have beds, but are struggling with staffing shortages. And many facilities won’t take patients with Medi-Cal (Medicaid in California) or Medicare if there are better-paying patients, or they will only designate some beds for them.

    California hospitals have not received an increase in Medi-Cal base rate reimbursements in 10 years. But while facilities downstream from hospitals can pick and choose which patients they take because the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act does not apply to them, hospital emergency departments don’t have a choice. So the patients stay.

    Increasing government reimbursement to cover the cost of care at hospitals, as well as at other providers such as home health, skilled-nursing and behavioral health organizations, would give patients a better chance of being accepted elsewhere when they no longer need to be in an acute-care hospital. Or maybe they would receive the proper level of care in the first place, keeping them out of hospitals altogether.

    Avoidable bed days are another sign of a broken healthcare system. Hospitals should not be stand-ins for nursing homes or specialized residential treatment facilities. Hospitals are the most expensive setting for these patients. And they’re not the right medical setting.

    This is an untenable problem that must be fixed, but that won’t happen until more people are focused on solving it at all levels: local, state and national.


  • 4 Oct 2023 4:18 PM | Matt Zavadsky (Administrator)

    Outstanding program that many communities/agencies are implementing, or at least investigating…  Kudos to the ATCEMS Team for this initiative!

    MedStar just entered into an agreement with a commercial payer that reimburses us for this type of alternate response, without sending an ambulance, including patient navigation through our 911 center… It uses CPT codes vs. typical HCPCS ambulance codes, for the alternate response reimbursements.

    Key quotes from the news report –

    • ‘Selena Xie, president of the union that represents EMS workers in Austin, says 90% of 911 EMS calls are not medical emergencies, but are resource needs. So this program gets people the help they need, while freeing up ambulances for the higher needs calls, like heart attacks and other life-threatening situations.’
    • ‘Over the summer, Council Member Alison Alter pushed to have more money for paramedics included in the budget so the program can run 24/7. “This is really important if we want to grow as a city,” Alter said. The city can respond to calls for help "without having to add a million [fire and EMS] stations as we grow.”’
    • ‘When someone calls 911 and they don't necessarily need an ambulance or to go to the emergency room — they have an infected wound or a minor injury requiring stitches, for instance — this team of paramedics responds with alternative solutions. The goal is usually to keep the person at home.’

    --------------------------------

    A 911 call for help doesn't always require an ambulance. But these paramedics respond.

    KUT 90.5 | By Luz Moreno-Lozano

    October 2, 2023

    https://www.kut.org/austin/2023-10-02/a-911-call-for-help-doesnt-always-require-an-ambulance-but-these-paramedics-respond

    Capt. Doug Schulz looks just like any other paramedic in Austin. He wears a navy blue uniform with his name pressed on the right corner of his chest. He carries a medical bag with equipment and sky blue gloves.

    But his job is different — and it's not just that he responds to calls for help in an SUV instead of an ambulance. It's that he has the ability to meet people where they are.

    Schulz is part of a team of paramedics referred to as the Collaborative Care Communication Center, or C4, a program that began with the COVID-19 pandemic.

    The team aims to respond to calls for help that do not require an ambulance or trip to the emergency room, reducing the strain on hospitals and the health care system.

    “Back in March [2020], I got a call from one of our chiefs,” Schulz said. “He said, 'You are going to screen COVID calls that come in on 911, and we are going to try to deal with them without overloading the system or the ambulances.'”

    But that was just for COVID-related calls. As the pandemic dwindled, Schulz said the team realized they were really good at this, responding to calls that weren't necessarily emergencies.

    “We eventually thought: Why don't we do it for these other low-acuity calls,” he said, referring to calls for help that wouldn't be considered emergencies. “That is what birthed the [program].”

    What is C4?

    The Collaborative Care Communication Center is sort of like a telehealth line, Gabe Webber, a commander with C4, said.

    “Maybe that is an oversimplification,” he said. “But it is our way of trying to find alternative dispositions for low-acuity health care needs.”

    When someone calls 911 and they don't necessarily need an ambulance or to go to the emergency room — they have an infected wound or a minor injury requiring stitches, for instance — this team of paramedics responds with alternative solutions. The goal is usually to keep the person at home.

    The program often caters to people who are either low-income or vulnerable and have no other resources. Many are dealing with chronic health issues.

    Michael Minasi

    The goal of the C4 team is to treat a person where they are and not bring them to the emergency room.

    “Usually they don't have a relationship with a primary care provider,” Webber said. “They have no place else to turn, so disproportionately they’ll access 911.”

    That creates a cycle, he said. They get into an ambulance, are seen by a doctor at the hospital, and told to follow up, but they don’t because they don’t have the ability to do so. That's where C4 comes in.

    “We try to break that endless cycle,” Webber said, “and try to connect them with an appropriate resource.”

    That then not only creates a better outcome for the patient, but is also a cost savings. Operating an ambulance and going to the hospital are expensive, Webber said.

    Selena Xie, president of the union that represents EMS workers in Austin, says 90% of 911 EMS calls are not medical emergencies, but are resource needs. For example, she said, if someone calls 911 who has trouble getting around, a paramedic can respond to help and also provide a referral for services. So this program gets people the help they need, while freeing up ambulances for the higher needs calls, like heart attacks and other life-threatening situations.

    “It is a keystone of what we are trying to do,” Xie said. “We do have limited ambulance resources, and we are covering the entire county and city.”

    Using best judgment

    Schulz said the team is given a rough set of guidelines when responding to calls. “'Make good decisions' was basically the direction we were given,” he said. “Like, 'Use your best judgment.'”

    Schulz said the paramedics try to keep people home or where they're most comfortable rather than taking them in an ambulance to the hospital. But that's not always possible.

    Earlier this month, Schulz responded to a call from a 56-year-old man with a spinal disease. The man had been discharged from the hospital just two days before and had promised to give himself medicine through an IV. But all of the sudden, he couldn’t get out of bed and was unable to get this medicine from the refrigerator.

    Living alone with his cat, he called 911 for help.

    Schulz did his best to try to keep the man home, but because he had missed several doses of medicine and was unable to move, a trip to the hospital was really the best option.

    “He even agreed,” Schulz said. “He was right there. If he called 24 hours ago that would’ve been way different because we would’ve gotten a dose in. … We tried.”

    Expanding the program

    Schulz and his fellow team of paramedics respond to many calls for help. But they can only answer a call within the hours they are available — usually from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. The overnight hours are left unfilled, when paramedics say lots of calls happen, especially mental health calls.

    Over the summer, Council Member Alison Alter pushed to have more money for paramedics included in the budget so the program can run 24/7.

    “This is really important if we want to grow as a city,” Alter said. The city can respond to calls for help "without having to add a million [fire and EMS] stations as we grow.”

    Webber said expansion is important for consistency.

    “People do call 24 hours a day … the system never sleeps,” he said. “But during the day, certain calls are diverted [to C4].

    During the nighttime, those kinds of calls have to be handled in the traditional manner, and that creates confusion for paramedics in the field.”

    While consistency is important, Webber said, fewer resources are available at night, like walk-in clinics and other social services.

    “But we could potentially verify the stability of the caller and provide medical advice or maybe a temporary solution overnight, and then set up followup the next day,” Webber said. "Again, potentially keeping from sending that ambulance to that call."

    The goal is to have the program 24/7 by late next year. But Xie said there is more to be done.

    “It’s a good start,” she said. “And it's good to celebrate it, but we shouldn't feel like we’ve made it to the end zone yet.”


  • 20 Sep 2023 1:11 PM | Matt Zavadsky (Administrator)

    Yet another challenge that continues to pile on to the “EMS Misery Index”….

    --------------------

    Scripps News Investigates: The deadly toll of a US ambulance shortage

    Aging and damaged ambulances are making it tough for emergency departments around the country to provide reliable service.

    By Chris Conte and Daniel Lathrop

    Sep 20, 2023

    https://scrippsnews.com/stories/scripps-news-investigates-the-deadly-toll-of-a-us-ambulance-shortage/

    Jennifer Cowan didn’t used to worry about breaking down. 

    When she became an EMT in Clay County, Tennessee nearly 20 years ago, she knew she could depend on the ambulance she drove to make it to any emergency call that came in.  

    But now, a nationwide shortage of ambulance chassis is leaving Cowan and other EMTs constantly worried about breaking down on the way to an emergency — or with a patient in back, when seconds often can mean the difference between life or death. 

    “I’ve broken down running an emergency with a patient in the back before. [You’re] worried about not being able to get someone’s child or grandma to the hospital because you don’t have an ambulance to get them there,” Cowan said. 

    She’s not alone. 

    Scripps News Investigates found local emergency medical services departments across the country that have been waiting years for replacements and repairs of aging and damaged ambulances.  

    “It’s always in the shop for something. We’ve been ready to buy a new ambulance for years,” Cowan said of her ambulance as she navigated the country roads in the rural part of the state. 

    How we got here

    The paint is peeling on some of Clay County’s ambulances. Maintenance and repair bills are piling up. 

    Nationally, the problem began in 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic ground global trade to a halt, preventing automakers from getting enough of the microchips that are critical to making modern cars, trucks — and ambulances.

    Ambulances are made by a small number of specialized companies, which build them on top of bare chassis — the engine and frame of a truck — purchased from companies like Ford Motor Company and General Motors. 

    Vehicles using the components of those chassis continued rolling off the assembly lines during the pandemic, but in lower numbers than usual. 

    As the backlog grew, EMTs said they had more and more trouble with their aging vehicles. 

    In fact, in 2021 there were a reported 13,540 mechanical failures that prevented ambulances from responding, and in 2022 that figure climbed to 14,905, according to U.S. Department of Transportation data. That’s a 10% increase. 

    And, critics charge, automakers simply did not prioritize chassis for them over passenger trucks and other products analysts say are more lucrative than bare chassis. 

    “Our customers are in dire demand for ambulances. The fact that we know a lot of our customers are running ambulances way past their life expectancy, the reliability of products on the road is very concerning,” said Randy Smith, president of Iowa-based Life Line Emergency Vehicles. 

    Among the critics is American Ambulance Association president Randy Strozyk, who represents public and private ambulance service providers. 

    He’s frustrated that automakers and public officials haven’t heeded emergency responders’ repeated warnings.  

    “You would think we wouldn’t have had to jump up and down. This should have been an easy decision to make,” Stroyzk said. 

    Clay County’s aging fleet

    Clay County ordered a new ambulance in March 2022. But it still hasn’t arrived, and EMS director Andy Hall’s not optimistic. 

    “We are looking at our next ambulances five years down the road,” Hall explained. 

    Hall’s agency has four ambulances to cover a county that encompasses an area of 259 square miles.  

    The newest is a 2019 model, purchased and delivered before the pandemic. 

    The oldest is a 2010 with more than 235,000 miles on it — so many miles Hall had to get special permission from the state of Tennessee to keep using it. 

    And in Clay County, the situation is compounded by a larger issue in rural health care. Back in 2018, the county’s only hospital shut down, leaving this county of 7,555 people without an emergency room.  “We are their hospital, we’re their ER until we can get them to a facility,” Cowan said 

    In fact, the closest ER is now 20 miles away.  A typical round-trip call for EMTs lasts around 90 minutes. 

    That increases the chance that the oldest vehicles in the fleet will be put into use — and increases the chance that the newer, more reliable units will be tied up when a call comes in. 

    The new normal

    Meanwhile, in 2022 representatives of the nation’s ambulance operators, fire chief, EMTs and firefighters sent a joint letter to Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg that called the situation a “crisis” and asked that DOT push ambulance makers to prioritize them now and in the future. 

    But a spokesman for Buttigieg said DOT lacks jurisdiction — and that its role enforcing safety and environmental regulations actually prevents the agency from pushing for changes in “production decisions.” 

    At Buttigieg’s urging, a White House task force on supply chain issues did examine the chassis shortage.  

    Automakers told officials that the supply chain issues preventing chassis manufacture have been resolved, said U.S. Department of Commerce spokesman Charlie Andrews. 

    A representative of Ford, the leading provider of chassis to ambulance makers, echoed that. 

    “From our vantage point, Ford is not the current constraint in the ambulatory supply chain,” spokeswoman Catherine Hargett said. “Beginning last year, we allocated more chassis to ambulance converters to address a vehicle backlog created by pandemic-driven supply chain issues and demand.”  

    But ambulance makers, EMS workers and fire departments interviewed by Scripps News said they still are unable to place orders for chassis in the volume needed to reach pre-pandemic needs — much less account for a two-year backlog. 

    Before the pandemic, Life Line made about 250 vehicles per year. The company should reach 220 this year, Smith said.

    But that’s nowhere near what’s needed by those using ambulances day in and day out. 

    “I’m not saying I want a year’s worth of chassis in two weeks but they have the ability to do that,” Smith told Scripps News.  

    Meanwhile, the people who put their lives on the line said their concern is not just the current backlog — but what will happen when another pandemic or disaster disrupts global supply chains. 

    “We want priority. We should’ve been able to raise our hand once and this was recognized,” said Stroyzk, the head of the ambulance association. 

    Other EMS officials say they see long delays as a new normal that agencies need to simply plan for. 

    “They are coming through, it just takes some time,” said assistant EMS chief Dave Edgar of West Des Moines, Iowa. 

    But back in Clay County, Cowan and Hall said they’re just hoping their time comes soon. 

    “Our hands are tied, there’s nothing we can do,” Cowan said. “We can’t help people if we can’t get to people.” 


  • 20 Sep 2023 12:02 AM | Matt Zavadsky (Administrator)

    Interesting bi-partisan, bi-cameral happening in DC!  With support from the regulator, physician, EMS, and hospital community in WV.

    A coalition consisting of NAEMT, IAFF, IAFC and AAA are lobbying diligently to get TIP/TAD legislation introduced in Congress.  This effort may add some additional support for the legislation.

    -----------------------

    MANCHIN, CAPITO, MILLER, MOONEY URGE CMS TO ADOPT TREAT-IN-PLACE MODEL IN WEST VIRGINIA

    New Model Would Improve Use Of Healthcare Resources, Reduce Costs For Patients, Insurers And Hospitals

    SEPTEMBER 18, 2023

    https://www.manchin.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/manchin-capito-miller-mooney-urge-cms-to-adopt-treat-in-place-model-in-west-virginia

     

    Washington, DC – Today, U.S. Senators Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) and U.S. Representatives Carol Miller (R-WV) and Alex Mooney (R-WV) called on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Chiquita Brooks-LaSure to consider a “treat-in-place” model to address the workforce challenges faced by West Virginia hospitals and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers.

    “This would be a major step forward in advancing an improved model that better utilizes limited EMS and hospital staff while ensuring quality patient care and saving approximately $3 million in unnecessary emergency room visits.

    Furthermore, this model could be replicated nationwide, especially in rural communities with limited health resources,” the lawmakers wrote in part.

    The West Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services (OEMS) and the West Virginia Hospital Association (WVHA), along with a small coalition of emergency medicine physicians, EMS providers, and payers sent a proposal to CMS urging them to support a new “treat-in-place” model to reduce unnecessary emergency room trips by establishing medical triage lines for low-acuity 911 calls.

    “The availability and effective functioning of the emergency medical services system and hospital emergency departments are of vital importance to all West Virginians,” said Jim Kaufman, President and CEO of the West Virginia Hospital Association. “This demonstration will provide the flexibility necessary for our first responders to care for West Virginians in the appropriate setting and it aligns with the goals of better utilizing EMS and hospital staff while ensuring quality patient care and reducing unnecessary emergency room visits. Emergency medical services systems, hospitals, and their emergency departments, are fundamental components of West Virginia’s health care delivery network.

    Together they provide the state’s safety net and CMS’s approval of this project will go a long way to ensure access to care, especially in our most rural communities.”

    The full letter is available below or here:

    Dear Administrator Brooks-LaSure,

    We write to you to ask you to review the proposal submitted by the West Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services (OEMS) and the West Virginia Hospital Association (WVHA) along with a small coalition of emergency medicine physicians, EMS providers, and payers to explore a statewide, multi-payer demonstration to address the workforce challenges faced by West Virginia hospitals and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI), or “Innovation Center,” was authorized under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and tasked with designing, implementing, and testing new health care payment models to address growing concerns about rising costs, quality of care, and inefficient spending. We feel that the proposal submitted by the coalition of providers in West Virginia warrants a closer review by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and CMMI.

    During the Public Health Emergency (PHE), the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) provided greater flexibility allowing EMS to treat certain conditions at the scene or transport patients to an alternative site of care.

    However, this flexibility appeared to have limited impact in West Virginia due to several factors such as in rural communities where there are no alternatives sites of care while in urban areas the alternatives sites were not prepared for an ambulance presenting at their facility.

    Beyond the CMS flexibilities, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) launched the Emergency Triage, Treat, and Transport (ET3) voluntary, five-year payment model to provide greater flexibility for Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) beneficiaries following a 911 call. West Virginia chose not to participate in the ET3 demonstration, and one barrier noted was the requirement to transport patients to an alternative site of care. However, Kanawha County West Virginia EMS did participate in the community paramedicine model allowing EMS to provide basic services in the community.

    The treat-in-place option that the coalition is exploring is built upon an effort in western Pennsylvania that focused on three conditions that can be treated in place following a 911 call and following narrow protocols developed by EMS. The effort in Pennsylvania was unsuccessful because only one payer participated, so EMS had to have different processes for patient’s based on their insurance status. As a result, the coalition has focused on one model for EMS with a goal of securing most payers agreeing to participate in the treat-in-place option, so EMS has one statewide protocol and billing process.

    Additionally, we are aware that CMS decided to end the ET3 Model on December 31, 2023, which is two years prior to the original agreement. We feel that a statewide model, such as the coalition is proposing, warrants review despite that lower than anticipated projected interventions from the ET3 Model. By utilizing a multi-payor state model, CMS would be best able to receive robust quantitative and qualitative date to review the models’ efficacy.

    After receiving initial support for the treat-in-place option from the coalition and three statewide payers (Highmark, Public Employee Insurance Agency (PEIA), and Medicaid) OEMS has started drafting protocols for three conditions:

    • Diabetes – Hypoglycemia Evaluation
    • Asthma/COPD Evaluation
    • Seizure Evaluation

    Based on preliminary data for these three conditions, about 15,000 patients sought care in West Virginia hospitals’ emergency departments but were not admitted as inpatients in 2022.

    Furthermore, EMS 2022 data shows that symptoms of these conditions prompted 64,777 calls of which 49,061 were transported for additional care, while 4,136 were treated at the scene or released for other transportation. It is important to note that the planned EMS services for the treat-in-place option is within the current scope of practice of EMS. In addition to the services provided by EMS, part of the protocol will be to advise the patient to follow-up with their primary care provider to ensure continuity of care.

    If Medicare would participate in this demonstration, West Virginia would be able to advance a statewide demonstration that all EMS providers could participate in while having the payers for approximately 75 percent of the patients that EMS treats included in the demonstration. This would be a major step forward in advancing an improved model that better utilizes limited EMS and hospital staff while ensuring quality patient care and saving approximately $3 million in unnecessary emergency room visits. Furthermore, this model could be replicated nationwide, especially in rural communities with limited health resources.

    We appreciate your review of this matter, and look forward to hearing from you regarding your consideration of the coalition’s proposal.


  • 15 Sep 2023 7:20 AM | Matt Zavadsky (Administrator)

    EMS-based MIH programs designed to reduce preventable readmissions may gain traction because of this finding. At MedStar, we’ve seen a significant increase in referrals from our partner hospitals as they derive economic value from reducing readmissions.                                                                                    

    Note the reference to staffing issues in in post-acute care settings as a driver of readmissions.

    EMS agencies could be a valuable partner for hospitals struggling with readmission rates.

    -----------------------

    More hospitals to be charged readmissions penalties: CMS

    MARI DEVEREAUX

    September 15, 2023

    https://www.modernhealthcare.com/safety-quality/hospital-readmissions-penalties-increasing-2024-cms

    More hospitals will face readmissions penalties in 2024, a departure from the lower rates of reimbursement cuts providers saw last year, according to preliminary data released Thursday.

    While the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has resumed use of its pneumonia readmissions measure, which was excluded last year from its Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, payment adjustments have not returned to pre-pandemic levels.

    The hospital readmissions performance period for fiscal year 2024 still excludes data from the first half of 2020, pulling claims from July 2019 to December 2019 and from July 2020 to June 2022. The penalties also exclude data from hospitals with approved extraordinary circumstance exceptions.

    “It's probably going to be a messy couple of years,” said Akin Demehin, senior director for quality and patient safety policy at the American Hospital Association. “The ways in which COVID-19 interacts with quality performance on things like readmissions will take time to settle out completely.”

    Higher rates of penalties for hospitals likely reflect their hardships during peak months of the pandemic in 2021 and 2022, Demehin said.

    For the upcoming year, 70.1% of hospitals will be charged penalties of less than 1% on their readmissions. That compares with 67.1% of hospitals in fiscal 2023.

    Meanwhile, 7.5% of hospitals will be charged penalties of 1% or more in fiscal 2024, a percentage virtually unchanged from last year. Another 22.4%of hospitals will not be assessed penalties.

    The average penalty for hospitals with the highest proportion of Medicare-Medicaid dual-eligible patients—peer group five—is 0.29%. For hospitals with the lowest number of dual-eligible patients—peer group one—the average penalty is 0.34%. During fiscal year 2023, groups five and one were penalized 0.23% and 0.37%, respectively, on their readmissions.

    Before 2020, penalties were on the rise following an increase in measures that are part of the readmissions program.

    It is hard to compare readmission rates between periods of the pandemic due to factors like spiking variants affecting hospitals in separate locations at various points in time, said Rick Kes, senior healthcare analyst at RSM.

    “You had employment issues in different geographic markets and a pretty substantial increase in traveling nurses, which changed how care was being delivered to patients,” Kes said.

    While hospitals have increased their focus on quality and length of patient stay during the past few years, and the acute nature of the pandemic has begun to subside, there are likely still areas of improvement for hospitals to work on, he said.

    Understaffing in post-acute care facilities and home health agencies, as well as hospitals’ lack of ability to discharge patients are also problems that contribute to poor readmission rates, Kes said.



  • 13 Sep 2023 8:14 AM | Matt Zavadsky (Administrator)

    Interesting data in the FAIR Health report, but notably lacking is the reasons for out-of-network status of ambulance claims. Likely reasons cited by ambulance agencies have included:

    • Lack of interest by insurers to contract with ambulance agencies, citing < 1% of the payer’s spend is on ambulance services and they are focused on providers that represent larger % of their spend.
    • Low in-network reimbursement rates offered by insurers, well below the cost-of-service provision.
    • The basic in-network model (lower fees in return for higher volume (i.e.: more efficiency) does not work for primarily 911 providers (911 calls represent most out-of-network claims))
    • Many public EMS agencies lack the desire to become in-network providers.

    You can download the FAIR Health report at the link below – Notable findings are highlighted below.

    ----------------

    Most ambulance rides still out of network

    By Maya Goldman and Tina Reed

    Sep 13, 2023

    https://www.axios.com/newsletters/axios-vitals-4fcd9efd-e475-4636-9f48-149d4b989270.html

    Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

    Nearly 60% of ground ambulance rides were out of network in 2022, according to an analysis provided first to Axios by FAIR Health.

    Why it matters: Patients can't really shop around for an ambulance ride, but they're getting smacked with major medical bills because their emergency transportation is outside of their insurers' network, Tina writes.

    • Using its collection of 42 billion private health claims records, FAIR Health found most ground ambulance claims were out of network between 2018 and 2022.
    • There was a small decline in out-of-network ambulance rides during that time, from 63.7% in 2018 to 59.4% in 2022.

    Our thought bubble: The data indicates that ground ambulances likely remain a large source of surprise bills after Congress dropped them from surprise billing legislation.

    What we're watching: A congressional advisory committee last month examined the ground ambulance issue, and it plans to make recommendations in November, per PBS Newshour.

    What we're also watching: The internet's favorite physician-comedian Dr. Glaucomflecken's recent take on ambulance bills.

    ---------------------

    Notable excerpts from the FAIR Health report:

    • “In addition to being used for transport, ground ambulances can provide on-site treatment, without transporting the patient from the original location to a hospital. Such treatment increased from 2018 to 2020, rising from 1.4 percent to 2.0 percent of all ground ambulance claim lines, but decreased slightly in the following years, dropping to 1.9 percent by 2022.”
    • “From 2018 to 2022, response and treatment without transport accounted for a higher percentage of ground ambulance claim lines among individuals aged 19 to 35 than any other age group: between 2.2 and 3.1 percent. By comparison, the age cohort 65 years and older had the lowest percentage.”

    More agencies may be finally billing for Treatment in Place (TIP), but the CMS COVID waivers may have impacted this statistic.

    Also notable, the data does not include Medicare FFS claims.

    Other notable findings in the report:

    The average allowable fees in these states are below the national average COST of providing service, according to cost report data from the Public Consulting Group.



    We may need to do a better job of documenting clinical impressions to reduce the number of “General Illness” claims.





    Only about 30% of the patients under 65 transported to the ED by ambulance were admitted to the hospital. Can we do something other than transport to the ED with the other 70% of the patients?


  • 31 Aug 2023 7:06 AM | Matt Zavadsky (Administrator)

    Another example of the major challenges facing communities across the country, and their EMS agencies.

    The latest media tracker has identified 1,087 of the 1,177 (92.4%) local and national news stories about EMS highlight staffing and funding challenges, with 65 agency closures since 2021.

    -------------------

    Why Pennsylvania paramedics say ‘EMS is dying’

    The state budget includes a $20.7 million increase to ambulance reimbursement rates, but EMS agencies say much more is needed.

    by Gillian McGoldrick

    Aug. 30, 2023

    https://www.inquirer.com/politics/pennsylvania/ems-philly-lansdale-reimbursement-ambulances-20230830.html

    HARRISBURG — Emergency medical services are the only first responders that most Pennsylvanians don’t pay toward until they call 911.

    And EMS agencies are warning that they might not be there when they’re needed if they don’t see substantial funding increases.

    For years, EMS agencies have been generating less revenue than they need to operate each year. Unlike other first responders, they rely entirely on ambulance reimbursements, philanthropy, and other creative ways to raise money.

    “EMS is dying,” said Heather Sharar, the executive director of the Ambulance Association of Pennsylvania, which represents 220 EMS agencies. “How long can you exist if no one is paying you the cost for your service?”

    The funding shortfall has led a number of EMS agencies to close, with three in Pennsylvania closing in the last three months — leaving a ripple effect that will require other agencies in the region to pick up the need.

    “We take for granted that there’s always going to be an ambulance to respond if we dial 911,” said Shane Wheeler, the CEO of VMSC Emergency Medical Services, which provides emergency care to the greater North Penn area of Montgomery County. “Increasingly, we’re finding that that might not be the case.”

    The state Senate is expected to unveil Wednesday a plan to implement a $20.7 million increase to ambulance reimbursement rates. These funds — and a number of other new initiatives — were included in the $45.5 billion state budget signed earlier this month, but require further legislative action for the state to actually spend the money.

    Eight municipal governments, including Philadelphia, pay toward their emergency medical services through their fire department. Last year, the Philadelphia Fire Department responded to 251,501 EMS incidents, according to a 2022 city report.

    However, Philadelphia also relies on some independent EMS agencies to respond to emergency calls. These agencies don’t receive funding from the city and mostly rely on ambulance billing, Sharar said.

    Both Wheeler and Sharar said they appreciated the state’s expected funding increase this year, but much more is needed. For Wheeler’s EMS agency, a statewide $20.7 million funding would only increase its annual revenue by nearly $45,000.

    “It’s going to take a lot of $20 million initiatives to get EMS on a good, stable platform,” Wheeler added.

    Any delay to these funds hurts EMS agencies, Sharar said. The increased ambulance reimbursement rates won’t get disbursed until both the Senate and House approve them. The state House isn’t scheduled to return to session until the end of September, following a special election for a safe Democratic seat that is all but sure to return House Democrats to their numeric majority of 102-101. Until then, the chamber is tied 101-101, and House lawmakers are unlikely to return until after that election.

    VMSC Emergency Medical Services has turned to each of the seven municipalities in Montgomery County, including Hatfield Township and Lansdale, to request they each pay toward their usage of EMS services. Their annual request totals approximately $1 million, calculated on the number of calls in that area that they responded to.

    Wheeler said the North Penn region is better off than some Pennsylvania communities. With only about 10% of its population on Medicaid, most people have private health insurance.

    ”And we still have a 14% gap between revenue and expenses,” Wheeler said.

    Ambulance services don’t receive increased payment for providing higher-quality care either, Wheeler noted. For example, his agency has tried to add ultrasound technology to their emergency vehicles in an effort to determine a person’s condition before they reach the hospital. There is no way for them to charge extra for the clinical enhancement, which could improve a patient’s outcome.

    Ambulance rides are more than “just a ride,” Sharar said.

    “You are receiving a mobile [emergency room],” she said. “It’s not just the gas for the ride to the hospital. It is care. It is medical monitoring, treatment, and observation. It is a lifesaving resource that unfortunately, nobody wants to pay for.”


© 2023 Academy of International Mobile Healthcare Integration | www.aimhi.mobi | hello@aimhi.mobi

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software